<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PseudoSavant &#187; Opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pseudosavant.com/blog/category/software-category/browsers/opera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pseudosavant.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Musings of Paul Ellis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Take: Firefox 3 vs Opera 9.5</title>
		<link>http://pseudosavant.com/blog/2008/07/05/quick-take-firefox-3-vs-opera-95/</link>
		<comments>http://pseudosavant.com/blog/2008/07/05/quick-take-firefox-3-vs-opera-95/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ellis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pseudosavant.com/blog/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The browser wars have been heating up lately with the recent releases of Firefox 3 and Opera 9.5. As a long-time Phoenix Firebird Firefox user, and recent convert to Opera Mini (which is excellent btw) on my Treo, I thought I’d run these two through their paces to see what they are made of. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" title="opera-vs-firefox" src="http://pseudosavant.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/operavsfirefox.png" border="0" alt="opera-vs-firefox" width="158" height="128" align="left" /></p>
<p>The browser wars have been heating up lately with the recent releases of <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/" target="_blank">Firefox 3</a> and <a href="http://www.opera.com/products/desktop/" target="_blank">Opera 9.5</a>. As a long-time <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Phoenix</span> <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Firebird</span> Firefox user, and recent convert to <a href="http://www.operamini.com/" target="_blank">Opera Mini</a> (which is excellent btw) on my Treo, I thought I’d run these two through their paces to see what they are made of. The hits and misses after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-145"></span></p>
<h2>Opera 9.5</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.opera.com/products/desktop/" target="_blank">Opera 9.5</a> actually came out about a week or so before Firefox 3 so it was the one I tried out first. Opera takes a kind of “kitchen sink” approach, and is arguably the most feature packed browser out there. For the most part this approach works really well. Most browsers couldn’t duplicate the functionality of Opera, and it would take dozens of extensions (which often don’t work when new versions of Firefox come out) to <em>try</em> to pull off the same effect in Firefox.</p>
<p>Here are some of the notable features built-in to Opera:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://pseudosavant.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/image.png" target="_blank"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" title="Click for Full-size Opera Screenshot" src="http://pseudosavant.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/image-thumb.png" border="0" alt="Click for Full-size Opera Screenshot" width="135" height="167" align="right" /></a>Built-in browser sync (even to <a href="http://www.operamini.com/" target="_blank">Opera Mini</a> on my Treo!, try that with <a href="http://labs.mozilla.com/projects/weave/" target="_blank">Weave</a>)</li>
<li>An excellent download manager</li>
<li>Built-in <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">ad</span> content-blocker</li>
<li>Session management</li>
<li>Wand (auto-form filler on steroids)</li>
<li>Web development tool</li>
<li>A unique trash can approach for recently closed tabs</li>
<li>A novel speed dial start page</li>
</ul>
<p>The best, and most notable, “feature” of Opera is its speed however. It really is incredibly fast. It starts almost instantly; actually <em>everything</em> happens pretty much instantly. It is easily the fastest full service (i.e. not K-melon) browser I’ve ever used. Opera also has a pretty good security track record and is even more obscure than Firefox (smaller target for hackers).</p>
<p>While I <em>really </em>appreciate that I don’t have to basically roll my own browser (I’m looking at you and your extensions Firefox), Opera <em>may</em> suffer from a few too many features. Does a modern web browser really need an IRC or email client? Both clients are just average implementations, and the really odd part is how they show up as tabs in the browser right next to web pages. That said, you don’t have to use or enable them if you don’t want to.</p>
<p>The biggest problem I have is with the rendering in Opera 9.5. While most (&gt;95%) of the sites I visited rendered fine, quite a few blogs and Netflix didn’t look right. Even though most of the blogs probably suffer from poor HTML coding and lack of compliance to web standards, it is still something that was a bother. Firefox has always rendered quirky sites well.</p>
<h2>Firefox 3</h2>
<p>Now onto the reigning “alternative” browser champ, Firefox; here is the quick take on its latest installment. The good: all of the features of Firefox 2. The bad: not really anything new since Firefox 2. The speed has improved a bit and it hasn’t crashed on me yet (should that really be a <em>feature</em>?), but I really have to ask myself what else Mozilla has been doing during the almost two years between Firefox 2 and 3.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right" title="Firefox-Bilinear-vs-Nearest" src="http://pseudosavant.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/firefoxbilinearvsnearest.png" border="0" alt="Firefox-Bilinear-vs-Nearest" width="200" height="150" align="right" />Here are the only features I’ve found notable in Firefox 3:</p>
<ul>
<li>Scales/zooms images using a higher quality bilinear (or maybe bicubic, see image to the right) method instead of using a low quality “nearest neighbor” approach (finally someone did it!)</li>
<li>Download manager back-end has really been improved (resume actually works now), it is too bad they ruined the front-end UI for it however</li>
</ul>
<p>There really aren’t many other new features but most of them fall under the “different, but not necessarily better” category for me. Yeah, yeah, the bookmarks use a database now, but I’m still trying to figure out how that benefits me or why I should care, the “AwesomeBar” is a bit short on awesomeness, and the one-click bookmarking is only easier if you <em>never</em> organize your bookmarks.</p>
<h2>The Verdict</h2>
<p>The verdict? I’m still using Firefox. The page rendering problems and something about the Opera UI just doesn’t suit me well. Other than that though <em>it is clearly the better browser;</em> I will definitely be following its development. I am probably just too used to Firefox really; especially the keyboard shortcuts for tabs. If I was already an Opera user <em>I could not think of a single reason why I would switch to Firefox </em>though. If you aren’t happy with your current browser you should definitely check <a href="http://www.opera.com/products/desktop/" target="_blank">Opera</a> out.</p>
<h2>…one more thing about Firefox</h2>
<p>Back in the day one of my favorite web browsers didn’t really improve much for a long time, remember it? It was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Navigator#Fall_of_Netscape" target="_blank">Netscape 4</a> and they weren’t even the underdog. If Mozilla wants to maintain their momentum they need to bring their A-game, there is some stiff competition these days (Opera, IE, Safari) who are all <em>actually </em>innovating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pseudosavant.com/blog/2008/07/05/quick-take-firefox-3-vs-opera-95/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

